Grommie is the best traveller. He NEVER complains. He always lets me know when he needs a "whistle" stop. I usually need one too........

Not for me either

It's ridiculous!! Travel with your pets in your own vehicle and let the people who are trying to enjoy their flight alone.

I agree with you EnBird. It's bad enough for mums and baby's, it will be bedlam with dogs

It's up to the airlines to make that decision. But generally NO. There needs to be specific circumstances for animals, esp dirty dogs to be on planes.

I will not go on a flight that allows pets.

Hope they leave a few rows without the pets, cos I don't own a pet and don't want to have one any where near me.

Cannot imagine the pandemonium. I have experienced something similar to this. Many years my husband and I took our three young children for a holiday in a station wagon car (we had a mattress in the back so the kids could sleep). We also took our beloved family dog who was generally an extremely well behaved little girl.Well, she was very excited, jumped all over the children inside of the car and barked at every cow, horse, dog, sheep and cats for the entire 600 plus kms we travelled on the first day. We stopped at a small area so she could relieve herself and she decided to roll in something that was extremely smelly. So with that in mind, I have my doubts about even the best behaved pets being total angels when they are travelling albeit a plane or other method.Fortunately for us, the rest of our journey the next day was better, we gave her a bath, she settled down and the rest of us had a much more comfortable holiday. She was also very well behaved all the way home again a few days later. However after that experience we only took her for shorter trips afterwards.

don't have pets

Crazy. What happens in an emergency?

What about the people who are allergic to animals. I am supposed to pay to risk my life outside of the danger of crashing. We need no pet and smoke flights

I’ll take animals on a flight over kids under three, any day.

I have 5 cats who don't like to travel. If sent to a kennel they don't eat and they don't like strangers, so we don't get a sitter. There is no way I would take any of them away with me and instead we allow them a couple of rooms inside the house and someone comes in to feed them. Anything else is far too stressful for them, and if they get stressed they get stress cystitis which can be costly.

I've taken my cat on several flights, as there was no other choice. He goes in the pressurised hold under the flight deck. I hope if they insist on allowing animals in the cabin, all dogs must be muzzled.

What about all those who have severe cat/dog allergies?

wont be taking my pets on a plane.

When it comes to dogs that are quiet and well-behaved, why not? As for other kinds of animals, such as cats, birds and rabbits, I would be more concerned for their welfare than about anything else. The situation is likely to stress them out and not be good for them. They are better off left at home with caring neighbours or friends.

They should allow ppl to travel w pets

Would definitely travel with my pet.

I really dont mind either way. But i think its great.

Well behaved dogs.....why not and only on short flights.☺️

More simple too put them in a kennel, otherwise the Plane companies will need too put more money into accomodating them whether it’s a separate room for them but even then I wouldn’t want my dogs in a seperate room amongst over animals unless there’s security and comfort for them all, complicated scenario

i think the pet need to relax beacouse the long time's flying for pet is so hard

I would charter a private jet. Everyone wins!

Why not.

Sad about the comments.

NOT A GOOD IDEA TO HAVE THEM SEDATED .PUT THEM IN A GOOD KENNEL WHERE THEY CAN ENJOY THEM SELVES

Have your vet sedate the beast.

Can’t afford to go o/s! I wouldn’t take my pet on a domestic flight because my daughter looks after then

Sorry, not a good idea in my mind. At least in the cargo hold we wouldn't here what they think of the idea but in the cabin, really???

nah.

Having read the histories of how dogs were treated in planes in the past, I can't reconcile a plane full of people and dogs!

If I could afford the plane fare and all that goes with it, I could afford to have my pet cared for at a high class kennels. Better all round.

I think it is a nice idea. Maybe airlines could offer separate pet and petless flights since some people have allergies to animals and would not want to be on that flight. The noise of pets wouldn't bother me anymore than the noise of kids.

It is dangerous to put small animals in the hold because the temperature drops very low. Larger animals, birds and fish are on larger transport carriers designed for them. Fish are anesthetized for the trip. And, yes, it can be unpleasant with pets in the passenger cabins. The humane Transportation of Animals into, within and exiting Canada is regulated by CFIA under the Health of Animals Act.

I doubt if we'd take ours away on a plane with us. We do drive with them in the back when we go over to see my parents plus our old boy went around Australia with us. He did poo in the van once as we went out all day to climb Ulluru or walk around Kata Tjuṯa, it was one of those days. Old mat just chucked it away, no problems. He can certainly hold on for awhile, unlike a friend's old dog she wet in the house 3 times and on our new carpet. Lucky we have carpet tiles not glued down so we can get them up wash them, dry. them and then either put a new one down or put the other one back. Washed off cat spew last week. I must say I prefer pets than people, crying babies and obnoxious teenagers any day.

Yep I l8ve animals but there is no way I want one near me on a flight train bus etc would rather have a dozen mischievous happy kiddies

they have been doing it for years ...I saw a film once all about snakes on a plane

personally I would rather be in the hold with the animals than sat in one of the crappy seats with all the people . far more personal space

I love my cats but they go to a very good boarding cattery where they are spoiled rotten when we go on holidays. I would hate to be stuck next to a yapping dog and would ask to be moved. Assistance dogs only. I saw one on an inter island flight in Hawaii and it was no trouble. My husband is also allergic to dog hair.Edited 18-Feb-25 13:38pm

I haven’t flown in many years but I don’t think I would enjoy it. What happens when the dog has to go to the bathroom? I would ask before I got on the plane before I boarded.

During the 9/11 terrorist airplane attack on the New York twin towers, many US Airplanes were safely diverted to Gander, Newfoundland Canada. There the local people discovered many kinds of animals in the planes’ cargo holds. The biggest surprise were bonobos. The Newfoundlanders found a way to feed and take care of everyone including the animals during that difficult time.

I’d rather fly in the luggage compartment …. Love animals but people there are places that should be off limits for them

Apart from Assistance dogs I dont think animals of any size should be sharing a cabin

I don't think animals belong on transport in general.

I would not like to be seated next to any animal as i am allergic to animal hair it would not be a good flight for me

Growing up was "owned" by a miniature Poodle named Pierre who was much more traveled than I was!

Is it safe for the animals

I only have 2 rules when I travel, I DO NOT fly and I don't go anywhere my dog can't go too. So don't worry, you won't be running into me or my Buddy on any of these flights. I will say, however, that you would never know he was there and he is guaranteed to be better behaved than any of those kicking, screaming, snot-nosed brats whose parents can't/won't control them on the plane ( or anywhere else ) !

Unfortunately, I don't think there are any tests available to see how tolerant an animal is to plane travel. Yes, you'll find out on the way out but if the animal cannot handle the trip and does something really, really bad (use your imagination here (;-) ) what do you do for the trip home? About breast feeding, how old are you? In case you've missed it, breast feeding is not only a "natural" act but for the baby, a necessity. Last I heard, babies don't slurp so there's nothing to hear. Being ashamed of your own body is one thing, but you don't have to be embarrassed for everyone else' body. If nature bothers you, then don't look! Besides, unless you are sitting directly beside the mother, how would you know what was going on in the first place? Maybe this is the "mind your own business" warning.Edited 18-Feb-25 12:22pm

More than happy

All good, breastfeeding is normal and pets are family.

I would not book an airline flight is there is going to be animals in the plane.

I don't think having dogs and cats sitting beside you in a plane is a good idea, unless it is a dog for medical reasons.

I have no issue with certified service dogs ie for the blind, and certain medical conditions but not all the ones that are claiming they are service animals

When I was receiving PT one of the therapists bought her dog a seat next to her. I don't remember the airline but the flight was from Atlanta to somewhere in Florida.

Yes, yes, yes. Pet friendly no kids. Most pets are better behaved than tantrum throwing kids who kick the back of the seats. By the way, dogs have better bladder control than humans ... no nappy needed

I'm a pet lover so sounds great to me. probably smell better than some people.😆

when i fly i bring my Siamese fighting fish with me, i take a big mouthful of water, then slip him in my mouth, then when we get where we going, i spit him into his bowl, of course there are some problems sometimes, this my second one, i swallowed my first one by mistake......

Have no pets

The next thing you'll see is pigs flying.

Maybe not long flights . But around Australia all good

The only pet I want with me is my wife

I have a sensitive white cat. I doubt he'd like it.....

No pets in my house.against it on plans unless it’s a service dog. Some are even claiming other types of animals as service helpers. Edited 18-Feb-25 10:17am

Yes they should have airplane just for this people's. Or give a cheap flight on its or tell the people's that animal are on.

yes n no

Maybe on a short flight but long haul pets go in cargo

travel with snakes and spiders

Have never heard of pets traveling on airplanes other than in cargo, I am very surprised. Maybe on a short domestic flight only would ok, I am sure most countries wouldn't allow them in.

My fish don't like flying...

Absolutely yes animals should be allowed to fly. I have been on flights in Asia where pets are allowed in the cabin. They were extremely well behaved. However, I have been on many flights where the children are absolutely out of control, screaming, bugging other passengers and making a big mess when they eat. One lady even changed her babies diaper on her seat tray 🤮

Maybe for short domestic flights obviously in a capsule or small carry on.

I don't fly that often but won't use an airline that allows pets to fly in a plane I am using.Edited 18-Feb-25 09:12am

Tie them to the wings OUTSIDE the aircraft. A win/win.

Coming into Los Angeles, Coming in from London from over the pole, Flying in a big airliner, Chickens flying everywhere around the plane, Could we ever feel much finer? Coming into Los Angeles, Bringing in a couple of keys, But don’t touch my bags if you please, Mister customs man…

I don’t have any pets

I love animals but to enter flyt with I will not

Most pets are good dogs service dogs I am fine with it the only discussing the hair over the back sit !

If pets need to travel by plane they are contained in the cargo hold that has a special area for pets. It can be stressful for pets both in the cargo hold and cabin. Let's keep these situations sensible, yeah right!

I love having pets travel with us. They mostly sleep while we are driving or flying, but they are very well behaved, and have never had a problem with them. When we take our dogs on flights, everyone wants to pet them, which is great, because they love people!

Yes I agree keep pets at home

Now look guys I've been thinking, any flights longer than 2 hours, the pet Neo's will need to be recharrged. Now this might cause problems foer the Navigation equipment. So then more planes might fall out of the sky. So next we'll have to add more batteries to the Planes. But then there is a good chance they wont be able to lift off with all the extra weight. So better still all the neo's will be chucked in the back were the pets used to go. But then so many people will get borred with out their pet Neo's sitting behind them, and there might not be space for any of the big pets that used to be out the back of the plane.So I think we'll have to make the rules no Pet Neo's allowed to fly. But then what about all the flight attendant Neo's they only cost 60 cent's an hour. This could make the ticket prices a bit cheaper. Or if we make the planes bigger we'll still be able to fit all the'se Neo's on the plane and the same amount of humans not less humans like before, and maybe a bigger battery for charging all the Neo robots. Have I got the answer. No there is a problem still Bigger planes have a higher chance of crashing into each other, So we will still have to keep all pet Neo's off flights unfortunately, and no seats fitted with Neo charges, only mobile charges. But then we'll have to figure out whether these flight attendant Neo's will be better in black clothes rather than purple or pink. So there will have to be a lot more dating sites on the net to work this out. that is not good. So the answer is no more cheaper flights with Neo's flight assistance on board. Strictly no Neo pets on board, strictly no Neo flight assistance on board. But the debate will still go on. Or how about we pay the Neo's $1.20 an hour and then they will wear black clothes no questions asked. And then it could be solved. Edited 18-Feb-25 07:43am

Everyone and pets should have the right to travel.

when they needed a walk they could take them out on the wing...doggy walk?

I'd travel everywhere on every mode of transport with my pet if it was allowed, but I would also address the cleanliness and noise issue

HI, TY Danielle R 478487

Depends on temperament of pet and what type and model of transport Edited 18-Feb-25 07:15am

People here do not consider ESA and service animals. They are not pets.

You are right Danielle R 478487 I'm completely agree with you. Pets are very bad to travel together with owners in a plane. The other travels want to be comfortable and the pets; Mostly the dogs bother so much.

Pets are family and we know how they behave so for many this is great

Won't happen here in Australia

Everyone is spoiled now. If you need to travel with a pet, stay home. (Seeing eye dogs not withstanding)

My Dog wouldn't be allowed she is to noisy. Humans are animals. Cats could be more suitable they don't make much noise. What about You take your pet Neo Robot with you, and it could meet all the other Neo's walking around serving food. Unfortunately you might have to pay for a whole nother seat for it. Is it worth it. Maybe a guinea pig would be more suitable.

Not me. Even if you can take them by plane,if you go overseas you still have quarantine time in any country you visit. Would only consider if I had to move permanently to another country. Surely they would have to be contained. Could you imagine dogs,cats or other all on the same flight together,seated with their owners. Personally I think it's cruel, the noise alone would be distressing for the animal. And what do you do when they must be toileted?

I love animals but I do not want to be on a flight with one and if airlines allow them in the cabin then they should have a choice of "pet" flights and pet free flights.

NO PETS. There are enough human animals travelling now

I don't think animals should be allowed in the cabin no matter how well behaved or trained they are....

ty JANN R

Sounds like the private jet business will get a boost! :-)